We
currently live in a technological age in which we are constantly bombarded with
media and communication. Everyone
is emailing, texting, tweeting, blogging and “Facebooking” – from young
children to seniors. Grandparents
are checking email and trying to keep up with new technology and children are
growing up not knowing a world without cell phones, iPads, laptops and digital
media of all kinds. Life truly has
changed! Gone are the VCR-illiterate
days of my Mom and my Mother-in-Law – now they both email and text me on a
daily basis! The fact that my 7
year old and 8 year old kids figured out how to instant message each other
using their Nintendo DS’s still boggles my mind!
So what
does this mean for teachers? How
do we teach a generation that is being raised on digital media and electronic
gadgets? From my earlier posts,
you can learn about a variety of Web 2.0 tools that can be used in the
classroom to cater to this generation.
However, one question remains – has the importance of teaching spelling
and grammar diminished and/or become irrelevant for this generation? Why bother
teaching spelling when all devices now have spell-check and autocorrect? Does anyone even type out full words
anymore or is it all shorthand and acronym-based? I mean, really, when was the
last time you actually spelled out “laughing out loud” or “oh my gosh”? As well, all major word processing
software has grammar checking tools and a thesaurus. Will teaching the basics of handwriting, spelling and
grammar become a thing of the past?
My opinion
regarding this is mixed. I believe
that with the continued use of text-based media, the importance of grammar has
actually increased even more. If
our students will be relying on Twitter, Facebook, blogging, emailing and
texting to communicate, their written words had better make sense! The art of writing is definitely being
used much more now than ever and it is imperative that our students be able to
communicate their thoughts in a logical, sensible way – for which proper
grammar is essential and therefore must be taught explicitly and reinforced
constantly.
The second
part of this question involves spelling and I am conflicted with this
part. As the reigning spelling bee
champion of my elementary grades, I am a stickler for spelling and I cannot
stand when people email/tweet/post messages with spelling errors – it drives me
crazy. My “old-school” heart holds
correct spelling as an important skill, however my 21st Century
realization is that spell-check is a definite reality and when its everywhere,
why not use it? Spelling is a very
important skill and it comes easily to me, however if assistance is available,
then why force students to endure repeated, rote learning of spelling words? It does drive me crazy when my high
school students have atrocious spelling, but they do rely heavily on the crutch
of spell-check – does this mean that their ideas are not valid? The way I think of this is – no matter
how hard I try, I cannot properly parallel park my car. I learned how to do it years ago, but I
still find it impossible, so much so that I will park blocks away from my
destination even though there is a spot closer due to the fact that I am unable
to properly parallel park in it.
When the day comes that “park assist” is available in all cars, it will
definitely be my crutch and I will depend on it the way many people depend on
spell-check.
That said,
I do believe that spelling must still be taught in school, especially in the
formative elementary and junior grades, but emphasis should be on recognizing
how a word should “look” and long-term spelling strategies as opposed to
short-term memorization of specific words for a spelling test. I have personally seen this shift with
my childrens’ education. In Grade
1, my son had spelling words to memorize, practice at home and a spelling test
at the end of each week. In Grade
2, there was a shift to “weekly word wall words” that were used repeatedly
throughout the week and the children were encouraged to spell them correctly
and taught strategies for correct spelling, but pure memorization was actually
discouraged.
The last
skill that is related to this topic is that of handwriting. This one baffles me since, again,
“old-school” me believes that neat, legible hand writing is an essential skill,
however as we migrate to text-based media that involves typing, why emphasize
handwriting at all? Let’s be
honest, its faster to type a memo on your cell phone than to find a pen and
paper and write out a reminder!
The subject of handwriting was debated in an online forum of one of my
teaching courses, and someone mentioned that you still need to write things
down like phone numbers, appointments and items for your grocery list. Now I don’t know about you, but I
always have my iPhone with me and contact info, appointments and even my
grocery list all get typed straight into it. Pen and paper are an inconvenience! However, as a Chemistry teacher, I must
say that when writing out mathematical solutions to chemistry problems, pencil
and paper only! So, while we have
shifted to a typing society, it is still important to teach the basic skills of
handwriting since it is still a major factor in our written communication.
In summary,
I feel that grammar is still as important as ever and should definitely be
explicitly taught and enforced to all students. Spelling and handwriting are also important, but the heavy “old-school”
focus that used to be on these skills is a subject for debate and I feel that,
while they should be taught and reinforced at all levels, students should not
be limited in their communication of ideas due to some errors in spelling or
illegible handwriting. Just my
opinion – would love to hear yours!
I still (and likely in an unfair manner) use spelling and grammar as a way to judge people; just as a CV with a spelling error will ensure that it gets tossed aside, I will instinctively ignore or downplay many people's written words if I don't feel that they've cared enough to edit and correct. I'm not one of the people who bristles (overtly) when an apostrophe is misused, but errors such as this: http://on.fb.me/NsxOwf make me wonder.
ReplyDeleteI imagine that 21st century technology has created a new skill that many people have yet to master - situational grammar and spelling. I still have difficulties posting something on twitter that isn't grammatically correct when I should be using abbreviations and the other appropriate conventions. Similarly, one of our roles will be to teach our students the other (non IM) version of English and ensure that they use the correct version of English when appropriate. It would be nice if we could rely on spell checks and grammar checks. I turned mine off as I spent more time confirming the 'errors' it found were actually correct.
Oh, and handwriting is the main thing that teachers' college could not help me learn. I lost the skill of writing legibly 15 to 20 years ago so I hope that I'll be able to recapture the skill ASAP in September.
As much as I agree that spelling, grammar and legibility should not be the major considerations when we're grading, and that we must find a way to transcend these issues to examine what our students are saying, we are setting our students up to be judged unfairly by others in the future if we don't do more to reinforce their skills in these areas.